I’ve been showing off the artwork of nature, but I really like the contrast of BNSF 9378 (EMD SD70ACe) with the background. Note, this particular engine doesn’t have an isolated cab and thus will only be used in a DPU capacity.
BNSF 1791, an EMD SD 40-2, was coupled to BNSF 2685 in the Pueblo rail yard.
I’ve read SD stands for Special Duty (and I think they all have 6-wheel trucks), while the GP stands for General Purpose (and have 4-wheel trucks).
Letzte Wochenende habe ich mein Rad auf die Luftwaffe-Akademie gefahren. Es gibt einen kleinen See entlang dem Wanderweg, und die Eisenbahn geht neben dem See; es gibt auch ein Bahnanschlussgleis da. Ein leeren Kohlezug war am Bahnanschlussgleis, und BNSF 9787 (EMD SD70MAC) hat mit BNSF 6313 (GE ES44AC) am Ende es gesessen.
Last weekend, I rode my bike through the Air Force academy. There is a small lake along the trail and the railroad tracks go along side the lake; there’s also a siding along there. An empty coal train was on the siding, and BNSF 9787 (EMD SD70MAC) sat with BNSF 6313 (GE ES44AC) at the end of it.
Though I refuse to get involved with the whole EMD vs GE arguments, I have admitted that I like the way GE engines look better. I don’t really understand why or what it is about them; but from among the GE ES44-Family of engines, I’ve really come to like the ES44C4s.
Outwardly similar (the C4s use different trucks than their AC siblings), the ES44C4 (and the ET44C4s as well, for that matter) have only 4 driven axles per truck. The middle axle doesn’t have a traction motor on it.
Sitting at either the front or the back, depending on your view, of a short consist in the Pueblo rail yard sits BNSF 7547. This engine is a GE ES44DC, similar to the ES44AC in most aspects but with DC traction motors instead of AC traction motors.
It’s hooked up to BNSF 3799, one of BNSF’s Tier IV ET44C4s. You can really see the difference in height between the last generation and the next generation engine.